Why does the Wiki. Review crowd want to deny sysops the pleasure of coming down hard on misidentified vandals? – Just Cause 2: Video Game Review – Turtle (7.5/10) S02E21
Here is the Question: Why does the Wiki. Review crowd want to deny sysops the pleasure of coming down hard on misidentified vandals?
Doesn’t the Wikipedia Review crowd realize that coming down hard on people who happen to have the same IP address as vandals has great therapeutic value for sysops? Don’t they also realize that by falsely accusing innocents, they are also discouraging them from participating in Wikipedia, accomplishing that goal far better than all their wikibashing?
Best found answer:
Give your answer to this question below!
www.youtube.com Click above to see Mega Man 10: Video Game Review – Rob Talbert (8.5/10) ! Just Cause 2: Video Game Review – Turtle (7.5/10) S02E21 Rico Rodriguez is back in action in the thrill seeking sequel to Just Cause.Three violent gangs have waged war on the island of Panau. It is up to Rico to cause as much chaos as possible in order to get the attention of the island’s evil dictator. In the midst of this process he must also locate rogue agent Tom Sheldon. Using his grapple hook and daredevil habits, Rico takes over this 400-mile wide island. – - – - – - – - – - – - – - – - – - – - – - – - – - – - – - – - – - – - – - Follow Machinima on Twitter! Machinima twitter.com Inside Gaming twitter.com Machinima Respawn twitter.com Machinima Entertainment, Technology, Culture twitter.com FOR MORE MACHINIMA, GO TO: www.youtube.com FOR MORE GAMEPLAY, GO TO: www.youtube.com FOR MORE SPORTS GAMEPLAY, GO TO: www.youtube.com TAGS: yt:quality=high just cause 2 xbox 360 playstation 788687200592 788687100823 788687500791 eidos avalanche studios rico rodriguez panau cuba san esperito parachute grand theft auto grappling hook review video game review turtle VGR
the learning curve isnt that bad….im pretty sure you just suck…and the voice acting you get used to…oh and something for any gamer to think about… gaming is supposed to be fun……..the real world isn’t that fun! Thats why games let you get away from this realistic world and put you into a fun unrealistic, explosion-packed world
@mattryanownz Actually it’s just 1ft x 1ft in a square (1x1x1x1 would be in 4 dimensions not two). But the reviewer said its 400 miles wide, thats wrong, Its actually 20 miles wide, making it 400 square miles in area NOT 400 miles in width.
Rad game the bit at 2:13 really is rad I downloaded it online for my ps3 for free here 115 games . com There are simply hundreds of PS3 games there to pick from and the best thing is they are all free awesome game and website
lol i failed i meant the same thing xD
@MrGitar15 me to actually he is a puttana’s {whore’s} son this game is more cool and it looks like we are watching an action film i have gta 4 tlad and tbogt and saints row 1and 2 but i prefer this game
wth this guy sucks, the whole point of playing video games is to do stuff you can’t do in real life.
Plus he’s a racist bastard who wants everyone to have a stereotypical accent so he can tell where they’re from.
lol machinima is just trying to make every game thats not modern warfare 2 look bad
controls are not hard if you think about the many hours and content in the game the controls in retrospect are a very small percentage of the time spent in just cause 2 after you beat all the story and mission you still have 66% of things to do that where most of the fun really starts to be in
Complicated controls? No.
You’d have to be a complete noob at video games to think that.
Should i spend $60 on this game? message me back and let me know
check out my acc and leave a commet and i will reveiw it
7.5/10? more like 9/10 not the best game ever i think but it looks so freaken AWESOME
dude r u blind 7.5 out of 10 screw off
id give it a 9.5
@helmut345 what about GTA? you can do that in real life… granted you might get the chair, but still…
@fightingBRITISH try getting it used. it’s worth $40, mabye $50
@Halfway3 of course you can, but do you want to? considering the consequences?
we could extend it and say I play vidogames to experience what I can’t or don’t want to do in real life.
7 is ok for this game.
How did this get a 7.5 the other reviews i have seen are like 9.5 and 10 not no damn 7.5 you fail son!
this guys an idiot. . .has he even played just cause 2?. . 90% of the shit he complained about is because of his own stupidity. . and not the games fault
the graphics look amazing, alltough it has some flaws, it looks like it deserves a more than a 7.5..
r u shiting me complicated controls you learn it in like 2 minutes
idiot dont review these kind of games i just installed it a few dats ago and i just love it its really fun and u say hardcore gamers shouldnt play it whell my friend in the last few moths i completed more then 20 games on the highest difficulty and ofc without chetas and i must say that just cause is the one that made me most occupied sure it gets boring from time to time but then u remember the fun u have with the hook and parachute and the point of the game is to cause destruction review fail!
Everyone please sign the ECA petition at my channel. GOODKyle1 We could possibly lose the right to rated M video games like this one, even if you’re over 17!
this game shud atleast get 10
is this guy retarded?
Lisa, I understand what you’re saying, but I for one am one of the “Wikipedia Review crowd” who takes great delight in watching an admin block an unsuspecting and innocent user merely for the “crime” of subscribing to an Internet service provider that uses dynamic IP address assignments across different households. Where else but at Wikipedia could Person A be given the “no editing for you” treatment, simply because he uses the same ISP as some other family that lives a few miles away from him?
Just another falsehood that’s part of the Wikipedia mythology — “the encyclopedia anyone can edit”, really isn’t, is it?
Oh come on, if you want to use a question to make a point don’t just disprove a straw-man to make a dubious assumption look more probable.
The sysops or mods or whatever make mistakes I’m sure, but why would it be therapeutic, and if the WikiReview peeps are doing wikibashing then why would they care about it in the first place?
I’m sure no one’s out to attack people for no reason, what’s the point in that? Why don’t the WikiReview people try to fix things if there’s some problem?